Search Journal-type in search term and press enter
Southwest Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowships

Pulmonary Journal Club

(Click on title to be directed to posting, most recent listed first)

May 2017 Phoenix Pulmonary/Critical Care Journal Club
October 2015 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Lung Volume Reduction
September 2015 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Genomic Classifier
   for Lung Cancer
April 2015 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Endo-Bronchial Ultrasound in
   Diagnosing Tuberculosis
February 2015 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Fibrinolysis for PE
January 2015 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Withdrawal of Inhaled
    Glucocorticoids in COPD
January 2015 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Noninvasive Ventilation In 
   Acute Respiratory Failure
September 2014 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: PANTHEON Study
June 2014 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Pirfenidone in Idiopathic
   Pulmonary Fibrosis
September 2014 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Inhaled Antibiotics
August 2014 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: The Use of Macrolide
   Antibiotics in Chronic Respiratory Disease
June 2014 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: New Therapies for IPF
   and EBUS in Sarcoidosis
March 2014 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Palliative Care
February 2014 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Smoking Cessation
January 2014 Pulmonary Journal Club: Interventional Guidelines
December 2013 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Hypothermia
December 2013 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Lung Cancer
   Screening
November 2013 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Macitentan
November 2013 Phoenix Pulmonary Journal Club: Pleural Catheter
   Infection
October 2013 Tucson Pulmonary Journal Club: Tiotropium Respimat 
October 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club: Pulmonary Artery
   Hypertension
September 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club: Riociguat; Pay the Doctor
August 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club: Pneumococcal Vaccine
   Déjà Vu
July 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club
June 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club
May 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club
March 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club
February 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club
January 2013 Pulmonary Journal Club
December 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
November 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
October 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
September 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
August 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
June 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
June 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
May 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
April 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
March 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
February 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
January 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club
December 2011 Pulmonary/Sleep Journal Club
October, 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club
September, 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club
August, 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club
July 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club
May, 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club
April, 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club
February 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club 
January 2011 Pulmonary Journal Club 
December 2010 Pulmonary Journal Club

 

Both the Phoenix Good Samaritan/VA and the Tucson University of Arizona fellows previously had a periodic pulmonary journal club in which current or classic pulmonary articles were reviewed and discussed. A brief summary was written of each discussion describing thearticle and the strengths and weaknesses of each article.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entries in Medicare (2)

Saturday
Dec222012

December 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club

Meddings JA, Reichert H, Rogers MA, Saint S, Stephansky J, McMahon LF.  Effect of nonpayment for hospital acquired catheter associated urinary tract.  Ann Intern Med 2012;157:305-12. Abstract

This observational study compared the rate of catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in over 750,000 non-obstetrical adult admissions in 2007, with a comparable number of admissions in 2009 – before and after implementation of Medicare nonpayment for CAUTI.  The study was carried out in 96 nonfederal acute care hospitals in Michigan.  The authors found that although hospitals requested payment for urinary tract infections in over 10% of admissions, they rarely reported CAUTIs (CAUTI reported in 0.09% (95%CI: 0.06-0.12%) of admissions in 2007 vs. 0.14% (95%CI: 0.11-0.17%) in 2009).  Only 2.6% of hospital-acquired UTIs were reported as catheter-associated.  Nonpayment for CAUTI resulted in only 25 of 781,343 admissions in 2009.  Therefore, the new Medicare rule did not decrease the rate of CAUTIs, or generate any significant cost savings.

Previous studies have convincingly demonstrated that urinary tract infections are among the most common hospital-acquired infections.  Epidemiological studies suggest that 59-86% of all hospital-acquired UTIs are catheter-associated – highly contrary to the rate of 2.6% found in this database.  Likewise, extrapolation of previously-published surveillance data indicates that approximately 8,000 CAUTIs would have been expected in a cohort of 780,000 admissions. The finding that nonpayment occurred in only 25 cases strikingly demonstrates the inadvisability of using claims data to identify CAUTI. 

Under current Medicare rules, a hospital coder may only enter a diagnosis of CAUTI if it is clearly identified in a physician (or physician-surrogate) progress note.  No microbiological data are required.  CMS does not require coders to list all hospital-acquired conditions, and since hospitals are facing mounting financial pressure to lower their CAUTI rates, it’s not surprising the rates reported are so low.  It is a little surprising that the rates didn’t decrease under the threat of nonpayment – this may indicate that most hospitals are not actively “gaming the system”, but simply not accurately tracking CAUTI in claims databases, regardless of the threat of financial penalty.  Perversely, current law provides a strong disincentive to local efforts to improve surveillance of CAUTI, since accurate detection would likely increase nonpayment penalties, and could trigger reduction in Medicare payments for all DRGs for an institution that falls into the lowest quartile of hospital performance in 2015.

The diagnosis of CAUTI is often difficult to make with any degree of certainty by a physician at the bedside.  Symptoms of UTI are less specific and sensitive in hospitalized patients – especially those with indwelling Foley catheters.  The clinical diagnosis is largely based on quantitative analysis of pyuria and bacteruria, both of which are highly dependent on urine collection technique.  Until details of bedside diagnosis of CAUTI are formalized, no amount of retrospective chart review by billing coders is likely to provide an accurate tally of CAUTI.

Guideline advocates, researchers and our Federal government ought to quit using billing codes as surrogates for clinical outcomes.  Personally, I believe the best approach to prevent CAUTI will follow from heightened awareness of preventive strategies by bedside clinicians.  As a profession, we are already highly motivated to do what’s best for our patients, even without the questionable benefit of artificial (and sometimes misguided) incentives.

Messerli FH.  Chocolate consumption, cognitive function, and Nobel laureates. New Engl J Med  2012;367:1562-4. Preview

This article describes an epidemiological study that showed a strong correlation between chocolate consumption and per capita Nobel laureates in a comparison of 22 countries.  The correlation coefficient (r=0.79, p<0.0001) indicates that chocolate consumption alone accounts for almost two-thirds of all variation between countries in per capita Nobel laureates.  The authors humorously use this analysis to point out how an inherently weak study design can yield ridiculous results with highly impressive-appearing statistical significance (Sir Austin Bradford Hill would be proud!).   

“Ecological” epidemiological studies such as this are highly susceptible to error because the databases used to derive results contain no information on individual subjects (the basis of the “ecological fallacy”).  Thus, results like those found in this study could occur even if there wasn’t a single Nobel laureate that ever ate chocolate.  A similar study might show that national hot dog consumption was correlated with a powerful Air Force – the two have nothing to do with one-another except that they are both somewhat “American” traits. 

I was tempted to write a letter-to-the-editor in response to this article, referencing a fictional study in which we had found that it was not chocolate consumption, but rather blowing an alphorn while wearing lederhosen, that produced more Nobel laureates.  Biological plausibility is supported by improved cerebral perfusion secondary to increased thoracic bellows strength and augmented preload resulting from compression of lower extremity capacitance veins. 

Robert A. Raschke, MD

Associate Editor

Raschke RA. December 2012 pulmonary journal club. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care 2012;5:306-7. PDF

Friday
Nov022012

October 2012 Pulmonary Journal Club

Lee GM, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, Tse A, Cole D, Fridkin SK, Horan T, Platt R, Gay C, Kassler W, Goldmann DA, Jernigan J, Jha AK. Effect of nonpayment for preventable infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1428-37. Full Text

This article looked at the results of a pay for performance program initiated in 2008 by Medicare and Medicaid. The program was designed to reduce the rates of catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI) and catheter related urinary tract infections (CRUTI) by financial disincentives, meaning reducing payments for diagnosis codes indicating CRBSI and CRUTI. The study looked at the rates of CRBSI, CRUTI before 2008 and after 2008 when the program was initiated. A total of 398 hospitals were included and data from the periods of January 2006 and March 2011 were included.

The results of the study showed no difference in the incidence rates of CRBSI or CRUTI post policy implementation.  The authors concluded that the lack of response may be attributed to factors such as change in ICD codes, hospital based quality assurance programs that were initiated prior to financial disincentives, and the possibility that the financial penalties were not severe enough to change practice patterns.

Our discussion of this article confirmed several notions. First, our overall practice patterns have not changed, we still perform procedures when needed regardless of a pay for performance policy. Second, complications may be preventable but sometimes they are inevitable.  We must be cautious that in our attempt to be perfect that we do substitute what is most appropriate for patient care for what is more appropriate in coding and reimbursement. I will argue that real advancement and progress in patient care still comes through medical research, and with physicians at the bedside.  The more we lean on policy and guidelines to incentivize us the further we drift from the ‘ART’ of medicine.

Manoj Mathew, MD  MCCM FCCP

Reference as: Mathew M. October 2012 pulmonary journal club. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care 2012;5:230. PDF